Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: In patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma, adjuvant treatments with PD-1 and BRAF+MEK inhibitors were approved based on improved recurrence-free survival. However, as the treatments have significant side effects and costs, the effect on overall survival remains a matter of great importance. METHODS: Clinical and histopathological parameters were obtained from the Swedish Melanoma Registry for patients diagnosed with stage IIIB-D melanoma in 2016-2020. Patients under the age of 75 years, that had a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts, depending on if the SLN biopsy was performed before or from September 2018 (pre- and post-cohort), based on the timepoint when adjuvant treatment was introduced. Patients were followed for survival until the end of 2024. RESULTS: The five-year overall survival rates were, 67.3 % (95 % CI 62.0-72.9) in the pre-cohort (n = 287) and 70.1 % (95 % CI 65.3-75.2) in the post-cohort (n = 349), with hazard ratio adjusted for age, sex and tumor stage of 0.96 (95 % CI 0.73-1.27), P=0.791. In the post-cohort 72.8 % received adjuvant treatment, the majority with PD-1 inhibitors where treatment exposure was highest in those < 60 years (80.2 %), males (78.3 %) and those having thicker primary melanomas (75.4 %). No significant overall or melanoma-specific survival differences were observed when comparing the pre- and the post-cohort in different subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide, population and registry-based study there was no overall survival benefit observed five years after the introduction of adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III melanoma. These findings encourage a careful assessment of the current recommendation on adjuvant treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Helgadóttir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: