Why the study?
LA strain was recently recognized as a sign of diastolic dysfunction, but its value relative to tissue Doppler echocardiography and LAVI in evaluating LV diastolic performance in CKD patients needed examination.
Does left atrial strain provide superior diagnostic value compared to tissue Doppler echocardiography and LAVI for evaluating left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Does left atrial strain provide superior diagnostic value compared to tissue Doppler echocardiography and LAVI for evaluating left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
LA conduit and reservoir strain are superior and more sensitive markers than LAVI and tissue Doppler for evaluating LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support LA strain for diastolic assessment in CKD; leaves open superiority over Doppler/LAVI in prospective studies.
Background: In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and decreased ejection fraction (HFrEF), LA strain, an indicator of the filling and discharge of the left atrium (LA), was recently identified as a sign of diastolic dysfunction. Our objective was to examine the significance of left atrial (LA) strain relative to tissue Doppler echocardiography and the left atrial volume index (LAVI) in evaluating left ventricular (LV) diastolic performance in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 outpatients with CKD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were referred to the cardiology clinic at Tanta University for routine echocardiographic assessment during a period of 6 months (April to September 2024). Based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), patients were divided into five groups: GFR ranges from 90 to 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 1, 60 to 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 2, 30 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 3, 15 to 29 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 4, and less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 in Group 5. All participants were evaluated using echocardiographic measurements, such as the E/e ratio, left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes, left atrial strain, left atrial volume index (LAVI), and ejection fraction (EF). Results: LA strain conduit and reservoir strain can significantly diagnose LV diastolic function in CKD patients (p < 0.001; AUC = 0.819 and 0.869, respectively) using cutoffs of ≤36 and ≥23, with 86% and 95.5% sensitivity, 65% and 60% specificity, 96.1% and 96% PPV, and 31.7% and 57.1%, NPV respectively. An AUC = 0.926 was observed with LAVI among grade 1 vs. grade 0 (0.9 is considered excellent in diagnosing patients with and without the disease). Other markers had AUC values of 0.5–0.6 among the grades of the diastolic function, suggesting no discrimination in diagnosing the disease. Conclusions: LA conduit strain and reservoir strain are independent markers that represent a superior and more sensitive approach than LAVI and tissue Doppler echocardiography for evaluating LV diastolic dysfunction in patients with CKD, even in the early stages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsheikh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: