Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper aims to examine self-citation rates in developed and developing countries, as well as across the Global North and South, and explore their relationship with scientific productivity. Methods: The study utilized data from the OpenAlex database, encompassing 12.3 million articles from 50 countries published between 2020 and 2023. Self-citation rates were calculated at the country and socioeconomic region levels, based on the proportion of articles citing works originating from the same country. Results: Developing countries exhibited higher adjusted self-citation rates and stronger correlations between scientific output and self-citation. In contrast, developed countries showed weaker correlations between productivity and citations, with their citations being less focused on domestic works. While Global South countries account for 42.6% of total scientific output, their contributions represent only 10.4% of references in publications from developed countries, reflecting a concentration of citations among Global North nations. Conclusion: Despite the increasing contribution of developing countries to global scientific output and their growing representation in the OpenAlex database, these countries display high self-citation rates. Moreover, citations from developed countries remain largely concentrated within their own group, underscoring persistent inequalities in the flow of knowledge between the Global North and South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: