Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper is a sequel to Beall (2011), in which I both give and discuss the philosophical import of a ‘classical collapse’ result for the propositional (multiple-conclusion) logic LP + . Feedback on such ideas prompted a spelling out of the first-order case. My aim in this paper is to do just that: namely, explicitly record the first-order result(s), including the collapse results for K3 + and FDE + .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jc Beall (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: