Why the study?
Do novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) improve efficacy and safety compared to traditional anticoagulation therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Do novel anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) improve efficacy and safety compared to traditional anticoagulation therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Novel oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) are at least as effective as traditional heparin/VKA therapy for VTE management, with potentially safer outcomes.
May support novel anticoagulants as VTE alternatives; leaves open prospective confirmation of safety advantages.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common health condition with a high mortality and morbidity as well as significant health cost. Traditional treatment with parenteral heparin followed by vitamin K antagonist (VKA) has helped to decrease both morbidity and mortality over years. However, difficulties with warfarin such as INR monitoring, drug-drug interactions, and dietary restrictions has led to research for new anticoagulants. Thus, novel anticoagulants such as direct thrombin and factor X inhibitors have been developed and studied for various indications including the management of VTE. There is now good evidence that some novel anticoagulants are at least as effective as traditional anticoagulation therapy with probably safer outcomes. We have reviewed the literature on the medical management of VTE with the focus on the role of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban for this indication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skeik et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: