Why the study?
Motion estimation algorithms for CMR-derived cardiac strain are susceptible to variability due to image artifacts and spatiotemporal strain heterogeneity.
Does a combined stack of short-axis and two long-axis images improve cardiac strain accuracy compared to standard cine imaging in synthetic phantoms and mouse models?
Population
Synthetic heart model phantoms and mouse-specific CMR imaging
Comparison
Combined stack of short-axis and two long-axis images vs standard cine imaging practices
Design
Parametric study
Authors
Loading...
Supports preclinical CMR strain protocols in mice; extends methods but leaves human translation open.
Does a combined stack of short-axis and two long-axis images improve cardiac strain accuracy compared to standard cine imaging in synthetic phantoms and mouse models?
Incorporating a combined stack of short-axis and two long-axis images in CMR improves the accuracy of regional cardiac strain tracking in preclinical models.
Mukherjee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: