Why the study?
Catheter ablation is an important treatment option for ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease, but its safety and outcomes needed evaluation in an Egyptian population.
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes and reduce VT recurrence in male patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia?
Does catheter ablation improve outcomes and reduce VT recurrence in male patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia?
Catheter ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia using substrate modification is effective for achieving acute procedural success and long-term arrhythmia control in a real-world Egyptian cohort.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ablation for scar-related VT in real-world cohorts; leaves open randomized confirmation of long-term benefit.
Background: In individuals with structural heart disease, catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important treatment option. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of scar related VT ablation in Egyptian population. Patients and methods: this observational study included 22 male patients referred for scar related VT ablation from November 2015 to December 2022, ablation was done under general anesthesia using 3D mapping system in 3 tertiary hospitals in Cairo, Egypt. Clinical, procedural and follow up data were reviewed. Substrate modification in sinus rhythm was the main ablation strategy. Results: Mean age was 56.2±13.9 yrs., 14 patients (63.6%) had a previous myocardial infarction, 6 patients (27.2%) diagnosed as NICM, 2 (9%) patients with previous surgical Fallot repair.20 (90.9%) patients had ICD therapy. Short term outcome, acute procedural success in 23 (76.6%) procedures, VT modification in 2 (6.6%) procedures, failed ablation in 5 (16.6%) procedures. Major complications occurred in 3 procedures (10%).19 patients were included in long term FU, median FU time 24 months (range 6-85 months), no sustained VT or ICD shocks in 9(47.6%) patients, arrhythmia control in 8 (42.1%), 2 patients (10.52%) died. Conclusion: catheter ablation of scar related VT is safe and effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muharram et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: