Key result
ASA use for primary CVD prevention in older adults falls ~46% from 2017 to 2021.
Why the study?
Despite updated guidelines recommending against routine ASA for primary CVD prevention in older adults following landmark 2018 trials, real-world uptake of this evidence remained unclear.
Has the prevalence of acetylsalicylic acid use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease changed among older adults between 2017 and 2021?
Cross-Sectional (n=756)
No
Has the prevalence of acetylsalicylic acid use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease changed among older adults between 2017 and 2021?
The use of ASA for primary CVD prevention in older Canadians decreased between 2017 and 2021, suggesting an uptake of updated clinical practice guidelines.
Declining ASA use for primary CVD prevention in older adults may reflect guideline shifts; leaves open effects on outcomes in real-world data.
BackgroundThree landmark trials on the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were published in 2018. Since then, major clinical practice guidelines have been updated with recommendations against the routine use of ASA for primary CVD prevention, particularly in older adults. However, little is known about the uptake of this evidence into real world practice. The purpose of this study was to assess the change in ASA usage for primary prevention of CVD in older adults between 2017 and 2021. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study of ASA use for primary prevention in ambulatory older adults without known CVD in an urban Canadian city was conducted. Results Seven hundred and fifty-six participants were included. The mean age was 78.9 years (standard deviation 7.9) and 64.8% were female. One hundred and thirty (17.2%) participants used ASA for primary prevention, including 20.3% in 2017, 17.0% in 2018, 21.8% in 2019, 16.3% in 2020, and 11.0% in 2021 (p = .061). Female sex was associated with lower ASA use (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.68) and hypertension was associated with higher ASA use (OR 2.72, 95% CI 1.73-4.29). Conclusions Use of ASA for primary CVD prevention in older Canadians decreased between 2017 and 2021, suggesting an uptake of clinical trial data and practice guideline recommendations. Focusing on deprescribing of ASA for primary CVD prevention continues to be warranted, given the risks associated with ASA in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bolt et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (n=756). Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) vs. 2017 cohort was evaluated on Prevalence of ASA use for primary prevention between 2017 and 2021 (p=0.024). Acetylsalicylic acid use for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older adults significantly decreased from 20.3% in 2017 to 11.0% in 2021.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: