Why the study?
Intramural scar in RVCM may prevent rapid transmural activation and facilitate subepicardial VT circuits, prompting investigation into whether transmural activation delay during sinus rhythm identifies VT substrates.
Does the transmural activation interval (TAI) and maximal activation interval (MAI) improve the identification of epicardial VT-related sites compared to voltage and EGM duration in patients with RVCM?
Does the transmural activation interval (TAI) and maximal activation interval (MAI) improve the identification of epicardial VT-related sites compared to voltage and EGM duration in patients with RVCM?
Transmural activation delay during sinus rhythm is a highly accurate mapping tool to identify epicardial VT substrates in patients with right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
AIMS: In right ventricular cardiomyopathy (RVCM), intramural scar may prevent rapid transmural activation, which may facilitate subepicardial ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits. A critical transmural activation delay determined during sinus rhythm (SR) may identify VT substrates in RVCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with RVCM who underwent detailed endocardial-epicardial mapping and ablation for scar-related VT were enrolled. The transmural activation interval (TAI, first endocardial to first epicardial activation) and maximal activation interval (MAI, first endocardial to last epicardial activation) were determined in endocardial-epicardial point pairs located <10 mm apart. VT-related sites were determined by conventional substrate mapping and limited activation mapping when possible. Nineteen patients (46 ± 16 years, 84% male, 63% arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, 37% exercise-induced arrhythmogenic remodelling) were inducible for 44 VT [CL 283 (interquartile range, IQR 240-325)ms]. A total of 2569 endocardial-epicardial coupled point pairs were analysed, including 98 (4%) epicardial VT-related sites.The TAI and MAI were significantly longer at VT-related sites compared with other electroanatomical scar sites [TAI median 31 (IQR 11-50) vs. 2 (-7-11)ms, P < 0.001; MAI median 65 (IQR 45-87) vs. 23 (13-39)ms, P < 0.001]. TAI and MAI allowed highly accurate identification of epicardial VT-related sites (optimal cut-off TAI 17 ms and MAI 45 ms, both AUC 0.81). Both TAI and MAI had a better predictive accuracy for VT-related sites than endocardial and epicardial voltage and electrogram (EGM) duration (AUC 0.51-0.73). CONCLUSION: The transmural activation delay in SR can be used to identify VT substrates in patients with RVCM and predominantly hemodynamically non-tolerated VT, and may be an important new mapping tool for substrate-based ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Venlet et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: