Key result
Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion plus ablation linked to ~87% freedom from persistent AF/AT recurrence.
Why the study?
The optimal ablation strategy for persistent AF remains debated, and the vein of Marshall represents a promising ablation target.
Does a comprehensive ablation approach including vein of Marshall ethanol infusion prevent AT/AF recurrences in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=31)
No
Does a comprehensive ablation approach including vein of Marshall ethanol infusion prevent AT/AF recurrences in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
A comprehensive ablation strategy incorporating vein of Marshall ethanol infusion and anatomical lines is safe and highly effective, achieving 87% freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
May support adjunctive vein of Marshall ethanol in persistent AF ablation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The best ablation treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) patients is still debated. The vein of Marshall (VOM) seems to be a promising target for ablation and could be combined with a linear set of ablation lesions. The aim of our study is to evaluate the incidence of AF recurrences in a PeAF population treated with a comprehensive ablation approach consisting of VOM ethanol infusion (EI), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), a left atrial (LA) roofline, a mitral line (guided by the newly formed lesion after alcohol infusion into the VOM and validated by pacing), and a cavotricuspid isthmus line. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing the first ablation procedure of catheter ablation (CA) for PeAF were enrolled. All patients underwent VOM-EI, PVI, and ablation lines along the roof of the LA, mitral, and cavotricuspid isthmus. LA voltage mapping before and after VOM-EI was also performed. An implantable loop recorder (ILR) was implanted at the end of the ablation in each patient. RESULTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients (66 ± 8 years and 71% male) affected by PeAF were included in this study. The VOM-EI procedural phase lasted 21.4 ± 10.1 min. PV isolation and lines were validated in all subjects. The ML block was achieved within 10.8 ± 8.7 min. At a mean follow-up of 12 ± 7 months, 27 out of 31 (87%) patients remained free from AT/AF recurrences. Among the patients with recurrences, two (50%) had incomplete ablation lesions and three (75%) had "suboptimal" VOM-EI. In 23/31 patients (74%), antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) were discontinued after 1 month of follow-up. No significant complications were reported during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: this single-center experience demonstrates that VOM-EI systematically combined with an anatomical ablation set in patients with PeAF resulted in feasible, safe, and effective freedom from AF/AT recurrences in 87% of the population after a 1-year follow-up period according to an ILR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nesti et al. (2023) conducted an observational in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) (n=31). Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion combined with anatomical ablation was evaluated on freedom from AT/AF recurrences. Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion combined with anatomical ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation resulted in 87% freedom from AF/AT recurrences at a mean 12-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: