Key result
Adding VOM-EI and lines to PVI is linked to a ~35% absolute increase in arrhythmia freedom.
Why the study?
In persistent atrial fibrillation, pulmonary vein isolation alone yields modest long-term efficacy, whereas Marshall vein ethanol infusion facilitates mitral isthmus block and may improve outcomes.
Does an anatomical strategy integrating Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, linear lesions, and PVI improve freedom from atrial arrhythmias in patients undergoing first ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=226)
Yes
Does an anatomical strategy integrating Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion, linear lesions, and PVI improve freedom from atrial arrhythmias in patients undergoing first ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 82% vs 47%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Integrating Vein of Marshall ethanol infusion and linear lesions with PVI significantly improves long-term freedom from atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone in patients undergoing first ablation for persistent AF.
May support VOM-EI adjunct in PeAF ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background — In persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone yields modest long-term efficacy. Marshall vein ethanol infusion (VOM-EI) facilitates mitral isthmus block and may improve outcomes. Objective — To compare a first-procedure anatomical strategy integrating VOM-EI, linear lesions and PVI (VOM-EI+AS) versus PVI-only in PeAF. Methods — Multicentre, retrospective registry with 2:1 propensity score matching. Patients undergoing first ablation for PeAF treated with VOM-EI+AS (n=151) were compared with PVI-only (n=75). Primary endpoint: freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) >30 s off antiarrhythmic drugs after a 3-month blanking. Secondary endpoints: achievement of bidirectional mitral isthmus block (MIB), redo ablation, safety, and predictors (Cox regression). Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 9–35). Results — Freedom from AA off-AADs was higher with VOM-EI+AS versus PVI-only (82% vs 47%; p<0.0001). Achievement of bidirectional MIB independently predicted success (HR 0.114; 95% CI 0.041–0.321; p<0.001), while long-standing PeAF predicted recurrence (HR 2.685; 95% CI 1.240–5.812; p=0.012). Redo ablation occurred less frequently with VOM-EI+AS (4.8% vs 26.6%; p<0.001). Safety profiles were comparable with a low rate of major complications in both groups. Conclusion — In real-world first ablation of PeAF, an anatomical strategy integrating VOM-EI with PVI and linear lesions significantly reduces recurrences and redo procedures versus PVI-only. Verification of bidirectional mitral isthmus block and AF duration are key prognostic determinants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panchetti et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) (n=226). Anatomical strategy integrating Marshall vein ethanol infusion, linear lesions and PVI (VOM-EI+AS) vs. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmias (AA) >30 s off antiarrhythmic drugs after a 3-month blanking (p=<0.0001). An anatomical strategy integrating Marshall vein ethanol infusion with PVI and linear lesions yielded higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias compared to PVI alone (82% vs 47%; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: