Why the study?
Ventricular-vascular interaction is central in cardiovascular disease adaptation, but cardiomyopathy patients are predominantly monitored using cardiac biomarkers.
Does 4D flow MRI-derived aortic relative pressure and stiffness differ between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy controls?
Does 4D flow MRI-derived aortic relative pressure and stiffness differ between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy controls?
Advanced 4D flow MRI reveals that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and reduced ejection fraction exhibit altered aortic hemodynamics, including reduced aortic relative pressure and increased aortic stiffness, highlighting the role of ventricular-vascular interactions in the disease.
Altered aortic hemodynamics in DCM may reflect ventricular-vascular interactions; leaves open the clinical utility of 4D flow MRI.
Ventricular-vascular interaction is central in the adaptation to cardiovascular disease. However, cardiomyopathy patients are predominantly monitored using cardiac biomarkers. The aim of this study is therefore to explore aortic function in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Fourteen idiopathic DCM patients and 16 controls underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with aortic relative pressure derived using physics-based image processing and a virtual cohort utilized to assess the impact of cardiovascular properties on aortic behaviour. Subjects with reduced left ventricular systolic function had significantly reduced aortic relative pressure, increased aortic stiffness, and significantly delayed time-to-pressure peak duration. From the virtual cohort, aortic stiffness and aortic volumetric size were identified as key determinants of aortic relative pressure. As such, this study shows how advanced flow imaging and aortic hemodynamic evaluation could provide novel insights into the manifestation of DCM, with signs of both altered aortic structure and function derived in DCM using our proposed imaging protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marlevi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: