Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A collection of clustering and decomposition techniques that make possible the construction of sparse and locality-preserving representations for arbitrary networks is presented. The representation method considered is based on breaking the network G(V,E) into connected regions, or clusters, thus obtaining a cover for the network, i.e. a collection of clusters that covers the entire set of vertices V. Several other graph-theoretic structures that are strongly related to covers are discussed. These include sparse spanners, tree covers of graphs and the concepts of regional matchings and diameter-based separators. All of these structures can be constructed by means of one of the clustering algorithms given, and each has proved a convenient representation for handling certain network applications.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awerbuch et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: