Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Many philosophers believe that people who are not capable of grasping the significance of moral considerations are not open to moral blame when they fail to respond appropriately to these considerations. I contend, however, that some morally blind, or ‘psychopathic,’ agents are proper targets for moral blame, at least on some occasions. I argue that moral blame is a response to the normative commitments and attitudes of a wrongdoer and that the actions of morally blind agents can express the relevant blame‐grounding attitudes insofar as these agents possess the capacity to make judgments about non‐moral reasons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Talbert (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: