Key result
SARS-CoV-2 exploits host aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases via an unconventional complex that interacts with viral RNA.
Why the study?
SARS-CoV-2 utilizes canonical and non-canonical functions of host aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), prompting a need to review the identified aaRS-SARS-CoV-2 interactions and their biological implications.
This review highlights the complex interplay between host aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and SARS-CoV-2, revealing novel viral hijacking mechanisms.
No change to COVID-19 care; leaves open aaRS pathways as antiviral targets for investigation.
Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are ancient enzymes that serve a foundational role in the efficient and accurate translation of genetic information from messenger RNA to proteins. These proteins play critical, non-canonical functions in a multitude of cellular processes. Multiple viruses are known to hijack the functions of aaRSs for proviral outcomes, while cells modify antiviral responses through non-canonical functions of certain synthetases. Recent findings have revealed that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of coronaviral disease 19 (COVID-19), utilizes canonical and non-canonical functions of aaRSs, establishing a complex interplay of viral proteins, cellular factors and host aaRSs. In a striking example, an unconventional multi-aaRS complex consisting of glutamyl-prolyl-, lysyl-, arginyl- and methionyl-tRNA synthetases interact with a previously unknown RNA-element in the 3'-end of SARS-CoV-2 genomic and subgenomic RNAs. This review aims to highlight the aaRS-SARS-CoV-2 interactions identified to date, with possible implications for the biology of host aaRSs in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2023) conducted a review in SARS-CoV-2 infection. SARS-CoV-2 utilizes canonical and non-canonical functions of host aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, including an unconventional multi-aaRS complex that interacts with viral RNA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: