In one of the first studies on the effectiveness of fear-arousing communi-cations as a means to induce preventive health behavior, Janis and Feshbachl found an inverse relationship between the level of threatening material used and positive attitude change toward the recommended behavior. The find-ings of later studies concerning attitudes toward nuclear test bans: dental health procedures,3 the purchase of automobile seat belts, * and the cessation of smokingY6t6 generally support the existence of this relationship. The study by Leventhal and K a f e ~ , ~ however, found a positive relationship between the length of exposure to a fear-evoking movie on smoking and lung cancer and the wish to obtain and the subsequent obtaining of a chest X-ray. While this relationship was not statistically reliable, it was inconsistent with the same subjects ’ expressed desire to stop smoking and the findings of previous investigators. The authors speculate that the different types of actions recommended (to obtain an X-ray and to stop smoking) may have been responsible for the response discrepancy. They conclude that “when
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sam Radelfinger (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: