The invariance of various definitions proposed for the energy and momentum of the gravitational field is examined. We use the boundary conditions that g_μν approaches the Lorentz metric as 1/r, but allow g_μν,α to vanish as slowly as 1/r. This permits "coordinate waves." It is found that none of the expressions giving the energy as a two-dimensional surface integral are invariant within this class of frames. In a frame containing coordinate waves they are ambiguous, since their value depends on the location of the surface at infinity (unlike the case where g_μν,α vanishes faster than 1/r). If one introduces the prescription of space-time averaging of the integrals, one finds that the definitions of Landau-Lifshitz and Papapetrou-Gupta yield (equal) coordinate-invariant results. However, the definitions of Einstein, M{}ller, and Dirac become unambiguous, but not invariant.The averaged Landau-Lifshitz and Papapetrou-Gupta expressions are then shown to give the correct physical energy-momentum as determined by the canonical formulations Hamiltonian involving only the two degrees of freedom of the field. It is shown that this latter definition yields that inertial energy for a gravitational system which would be measured by a nongravitational apparatus interacting with it. The canonical formalism's definition also agrees with measurements of gravitational mass by Newtonian means at spacial infinity. It is further shown that the energy-momentum may be invariantly calculated from the asymptotic form of the metric field at a fixed time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnowitt et al. (1961) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: