Key result
Higher tissue contact during PFA yields ~71% more sustained lesions versus lower contact in porcine models.
Why the study?
Anatomic and functional lesion development over time across different atrial sites immediately following pulsed field ablation required evaluation.
Does electrode-tissue proximity improve the durability and size of pulsed field ablation lesions in a porcine model?
Does electrode-tissue proximity improve the durability and size of pulsed field ablation lesions in a porcine model?
Absolute Event Rate: 65% vs 38%
p-value: p=0.037
In a preclinical porcine model, the creation of durable pulsed field ablation lesions was significantly dependent on electrode-tissue proximity and contact.
Tissue contact may enhance PFA lesion durability in preclinical models; leaves open optimization for clinical durability.
Background: We sought to evaluate the anatomic and functional lesion development over time at different atrial sites immediately following delivery of pulsed field ablation (PFA). Methods: Using a porcine model, PFA ablations were performed in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial lateral wall (RA), left atrial appendage (LAA) and right superior pulmonary vein using four different PFA profiles. Mapping was done sequentially in 5–20-minute increments up to 280-minutes post lesion delivery for low voltage area (LVA) assessment and conduction velocity. Lesion characteristics were noted with voltage mapping immediately post ablation and at the serial time points. Results: In 9 animals, 33 sites were ablated. None of the four different profiles across all sites any statistical difference on acute lesion formation or persistence. Higher tissue contact was observed in the SVC and RSPV and lower tissue contact was observed in the LAA and RA locations. Higher contact areas were noted to have higher density electroanatomic low voltage area (LVA) (12/14 vs 5/18, p=0.01) and larger lesions on gross pathology (2 /14 vs 6/16, p =0.01) compared to lower contact areas. Lesion regression occurred in 16/33 sites. Sustained lesions were significantly more prevalent in higher versus lower contact sites (65% vs 38%, p=0.037). Conclusion: The development of significant and durable lesions for PFA appears to be dependent on tissue proximity and contact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2023) studied Pulsed field ablation lesion development (n=9). Pulsed field ablation (higher tissue contact) vs. Lower tissue contact was evaluated on Sustained lesions (p=0.037). Higher tissue contact during pulsed field ablation in a porcine model resulted in a significantly higher prevalence of sustained lesions compared to lower contact sites (65% vs 38%, p=0.037).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: