Why the study?
Insulin measurements are not advised for cardiometabolic risk screening in large groups, prompting the assessment of SPISE accuracy to diagnose cardiometabolic risk in Chilean adolescents.
Does the single-point insulin sensitivity estimator (SPISE) accurately diagnose cardiometabolic risk (metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance) in post-pubertal Hispanic adolescents?
Does the single-point insulin sensitivity estimator (SPISE) accurately diagnose cardiometabolic risk (metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance) in post-pubertal Hispanic adolescents?
SPISE is an accurate diagnostic tool for predicting metabolic syndrome in both male and female post-pubertal adolescents, and for insulin resistance in males.
SPISE cutoffs may aid MetS screening in Hispanic adolescents; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Insulin measurements are not advised for cardiometabolic risk screening in large groups. Here we assessed the accuracy of the single-point insulin sensitivity estimator (SPISE) to diagnose cardiometabolic risk in Chilean adolescents. In 678 post-pubertal adolescents (52% males, M(SD) age = 16.8 (0.2) years), height, weight, waist circumference, blood lipids, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure were measured. BMI, HOMA-IR, and SPISE were estimated; HOMA-IR values ≥ 2.6 were considered insulin resistance (IR). Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was defined with the joint IDF/AHA/NHBLI standard. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we obtained optimal SPISE cutpoints for IR and MetS diagnosis. The prevalence of MetS and IR was 8.2% and 17.1%, respectively. In males, the optimal cutoff for MetS diagnosis was 5.0 (sensitivity: 97%; specificity: 82%), and the optimal cutoff for IR diagnosis was 5.9 (sensitivity: 71%; specificity: 83%). In females, a SPISE of 6.0 had the highest sensitivity (90%) and specificity (74%) for MetS diagnosis. A SPISE of 6.4 was the optimal cutoff for IR diagnosis; however, sensitivity and specificity were 61% and 75%. In males and female post-pubertal adolescents, SPISE had a very good and good diagnostic performance, respectively, in predicting MetS. It was an accurate diagnostic tool for IR prediction in males, but not necessarily in females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Correa‐Burrows et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: