Why the study?
Studies specific to overweight youth and dyslipidemia are scarce, despite expert recommendations establishing BMI at or above the 85th percentile as the threshold for lipid screening.
Is overweight or obese status associated with an increased risk of dyslipidemia in youth aged 6 to 18 years, and is the 85th BMI percentile a good screening threshold?
Is overweight or obese status associated with an increased risk of dyslipidemia in youth aged 6 to 18 years, and is the 85th BMI percentile a good screening threshold?
Although overweight and obese youth have a higher risk of dyslipidemia, using the 85th BMI percentile as a threshold for lipid screening provides poor discrimination and its use warrants reevaluation.
Dyslipidemia risk was associated with overweight/obesity in youth but poorly discriminated by BMI 85th percentile; leaves open refined pediatric screening thresholds.
Obesity is recognized as a risk factor for dyslipidemia, however studies specific to overweight youth and dyslipidemia are scarce. Nonetheless, expert bodies have established BMI at the 85th percentile or greater as the threshold for “at risk” in youth and advocate for lipid screening. This study analyzed associations of weight categories and occurrence of dyslipidemia among a multi-racial sample of youth 6 to 18 years of age. In this NHANES cohort, overweight youth were at significant increased risk of dyslipidemias of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Obese children and adolescents demonstrated even higher risk. This study supports the hypothesis that overweight youth are at increased risk for dyslipidemia. Despite the increased risk, test agreement for overweight and dyslipidemia was poor. BMI at the 85th percentile did not provide good discrimination in detecting children with dyslipidemia and use of this threshold warrants further review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandra Metcalf (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: