Key result
Machine learning using nadir heart rate cuts ovulation detection errors by ~2 days versus BBT.
Why the study?
Traditional basal body temperature measurement for menstrual cycle tracking is susceptible to disruptions in sleep timing and environmental conditions.
Does a machine learning model using sleeping heart rate improve menstrual cycle phase classification and ovulation day detection compared to basal body temperature in healthy women?
Observational (n=40)
Does a machine learning model using sleeping heart rate improve menstrual cycle phase classification and ovulation day detection compared to basal body temperature in healthy women?
Effect estimate: -2 days
p-value: p=< 0.05
A machine learning model utilizing sleeping heart rate at the circadian nadir improves menstrual cycle tracking and ovulation prediction, particularly in women with variable sleep schedules.
May aid ovulation tracking in variable sleep; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
The accurate classification of menstrual cycle phases and detection of ovulation is critical for women's health management, particularly in addressing infertility, alleviating premenstrual syndrome, and preventing hormone-related disorders. However, traditional basal body temperature (BBT) measurement methods are susceptible to disruptions in sleep timing and environmental conditions, limiting practical application. This study is aimed to overcome these limitations by introducing a novel feature, heart rate at the circadian rhythm nadir (minHR), for classifying menstrual cycle phases and predicting ovulation. A machine learning model was developed using XGBoost, and data were collected under free-living conditions from 40 healthy women (18–34 years) over a maximum of three menstrual cycles. Three feature combinations— “day,” “day + minHR,” and “day + BBT”—were evaluated, and model performance was assessed using nested leave-one-group-out cross-validation. The feature “day” represents the number of days elapsed since the onset of menstruation. Participants were stratified into groups depending on high variability and low variability in sleep timing. Results demonstrated that adding minHR significantly improved luteal phase classification and ovulation day detection performance compared to “day” only. Furthermore, in participants with high variability in sleep timing, the minHR-based model outperformed the BBT-based model, significantly improving luteal phase recall and reducing ovulation day detection absolute errors by 2 d (p < 0.05). These findings highlight the robustness and practicality of the minHR-based model for menstrual cycle tracking, particularly in individuals with high variability in sleep timing. The proposed model holds great promise for personalized health management and large-scale epidemiological research. High performance and practical machine learning model for menstrual cycle phase classification and ovulation day detection based on sleeping heart rate under free-living condition. • Developed a menstrual cycle tracking model using circadian rhythm-based heart rate. • The developed method improved luteal phase classification and ovulation prediction. • Outperformed BBT in high variability in sleep timing, reducing errors by 2 days. • Utilized free-living conditions for usability and practicality in the real world. • Potential application in personalized health for women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masuda et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Menstrual cycle tracking (n=40). minHR-based machine learning model vs. BBT-based model was evaluated on Ovulation day detection absolute error (-2 days, p=< 0.05). A machine learning model using circadian nadir heart rate outperformed basal body temperature in women with high sleep timing variability, reducing ovulation detection errors by 2 days (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: