Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Science literacy and creative thinking are key competencies emphasized in the Program for International Student Assessment, which evaluates students' ability to apply scientific knowledge to real-world problems and think critically and creatively in solving complex challenges. Thus, this study examines the impact of the Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome Based Metacognitive Approach (SOLO-BAMA) in improving students’ Science Literacy and Creative Thinking. The SOLO framework, introduced by Biggs and Collis (1982), provides a hierarchical model for assessing student learning, emphasizing metacognitive development and deeper understanding which was in the content of Higher Order Thinking Skills Professional Learning Package (HOTS-PLP) introduced by the Department of Education. A true-experimental research design was employed, utilizing pretest and posttest assessments to measure learning gains among students exposed to SOLO-based instruction and those taught through traditional methods. The results indicated that students in the SOLO-based learning environment exhibited significantly greater improvements in both Science Literacy and Creative Thinking. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test confirmed significant differences in posttest scores demonstrating the superior effectiveness of SOLO-based instruction. Additionally, the intervention group achieved higher learning gains than the control group, supporting previous findings that metacognitive strategies enhance student comprehension and problem-solving skills. These findings suggest that integrating the SOLO framework in science education fosters deeper learning, higher-order thinking, and conceptual understanding. The study recommends broader implementation of SOLO-based strategies and further research across diverse educational settings to assess its long-term impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobrera et al. (2025) studied this question.