With the emergence of Covid-19 pandemic, understanding the effectiveness of videoconference interviews as an alternative to face- to-face interviews in the research process has become necessary. This study investigated the effectiveness of videoconference interviews, adopted due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in the selection process for a pediatric residency program from candidates’ perspectives. The Zoom videoconferencing application was used for online interviews with all candidates. A post-interview questionnaire survey developed using Google Forms was conducted through email to identify their perspectives on the various aspects of the videoconference interview method, including communication, convenience, and interview-related stress. Most participants found videoconference interviews using the Zoom application accessible and convenient and reported that both verbal and nonverbal communications were clear. The videoconferencing format and the pre-interview meeting with the Residency Training Program director were reported to reduce interview-related stress. Most participants considered videoconferencing a suitable substitute for face-to-face interviews. Major obstacles were related to internet connection speed, the time limit on the free version of the Zoom application and securing a quiet environment conducive to interviews. So, videoconference interviews are an effective alternative to face-to-face interviews from the candidates’ perspectives. Internet speed connection and interview environment play an important role in conducting interviews. A meeting platform should ensure high bandwidth, synchronicity, privacy, and security. Future studies should consider interviewers’ perspectives on videoconference interviews.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saud A. Bahaidarah (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: