For many years, researchers have been concerned about the difficulties of integrating findings from dozens or sometimes hundreds of studies on a particular topic (see, e.g., Cooper, 1982; Jackson, 1980; Light & Smith, 1971). In traditional, descriptive reviews of research, different reviewers of the same body of research will draw markedly different conclusions, often in line with the reviewers' own biases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert E. Slavin (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: