Why the study?
Does the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure (inflection time and AIx) predict restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting?
Does the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure (inflection time and AIx) predict restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting?
Inflection time and augmentation index derived from ascending aortic pressure waveforms are significant predictors of restenosis following percutaneous coronary stenting.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May flag higher restenosis risk post-stenting; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
It has been reported that the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure is associated with systemic arterial stiffness. Stiffening of the aortic walls leads to a decrease in coronary perfusion and an increase in restenosis rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure could be used to predict restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting. One hundred and three patients who underwent percutaneous coronary stenting were enrolled in this study. We measured the inflection time and augmentation index (AIx) to determine the reflection waveform in the ascending aortic pressure at angioplasty. We then prospectively investigated the effect of inflection time and AIx in relation to the subsequent risk of restenosis after coronary stenting. After adjustments for age, gender, smoking habits, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, stent size, and heart rate, the odds ratio of restenosis in inflection time was 4.62 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39 to 15.4) for the lowest tertile of the inflection time level compared with the highest tertile level. As for AIx, the odds ratio of restenosis was 6.96 (95% CI, 1.93 to 25.1) for the highest tertile of the AIx level compared with the lowest tertile level. Inflection time and AIx are related to restenosis after percutaneous coronary stenting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueda et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: