Why the study?
Catheter circumstances differ between the ventricular cavity and pericardial space, which may cause bipolar ablation targeting the interventricular septum or left ventricular free wall to induce lesions with different characteristics on either side.
Does bipolar radiofrequency ablation create different lesion characteristics when targeting the left ventricular free wall compared to the interventricular septum in a porcine model?
Does bipolar radiofrequency ablation create different lesion characteristics when targeting the left ventricular free wall compared to the interventricular septum in a porcine model?
Bipolar radiofrequency ablation creates deeper lesions and larger impedance drops in the left ventricular free wall compared to the septum, likely due to reduced current leakage in the pericardial space.
Deeper LVFW lesions in porcine bipolar ablation warrant caution extrapolating to humans; leaves open optimal site-specific strategies in clinical VT ablation.
BACKGROUND: Circumstances around ablation catheters placed in the ventricular cavity and pericardial space are not identical, and therefore bipolar (BIP) ablation targeting the interventricular septum (IVS) or left ventricular free wall (LVFW) may induce lesions with different characteristics on either side of the wall. METHODS: Porcine hearts prepared for IVS or LVFW were placed between two inner containers which were set in an outer experimental container. For IVS ablation, each inner container was filled with Tyrode's solution circulated by a pump to mimic the right- and left-ventricular cavities. For LVFW ablation, a plastic board was inserted into one of the inner containers to mimic the pericardial space, thereby minimizing the circulating solution. Thereafter, BIP ablation (30W, 120-s) was attempted 30 applications each in IVS and LVFW. RESULTS: All 60 applications were successfully accomplished without steam-pop. Total impedance decline (TID) and %-TID were larger in LVFW than IVS ablation (-19.4 ± 5.3 vs. -15.8 ± 4.6 Ω, and -16.2 ± 4.0 vs. -13.2 ± 3.6%), and total lesion depth was deeper in LVFW than in IVS (14.4 ± 2.6 vs. 12.7 ± 3.3 mm) due to deeper lesions in the epicardial wall. Surface lesions were also larger in epicardial than in endocardial wall in LVFW ablation, whereas there were no differences between right- and left-side septal wall. Transmural lesion was created in 13/30 in LVFW and 9/30 in IVS ablation. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to IVS, BIP ablation targeting LVFW demonstrated larger TID and induced deeper lesions in the epicardial wall in this study, probably due to less current leakage into the small space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saitoh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: