Does temperature-controlled very high-power short-duration ablation improve safety, efficacy, and freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias compared to a hybrid approach in patients with AF?
Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation using a novel catheter provides safe and effective pulmonary vein isolation with short procedure times, with no difference in outcomes between very high-power and hybrid approaches.
AIMS: Temperature-controlled high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) utilizing a novel ablation catheter (QDOT Micro) with real-time assessment of catheter tip temperature aims for safer, more effective, and faster procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: The peQasus study is a large European multicentre study set up to assess safety, acute efficacy, and outcomes of temperature-controlled HPSD-based PVI. The primary endpoints were safety, efficacy, and 12-month freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias. Additionally, two strategies namely very HPSD (90 W for 4 s) only and a hybrid approach (HPSD with maximum of 50 W and vHPSD) were compared. A total of 1023 AF patients in 15 centres from nine European countries received PVI with the QDOT. Complete PVI was successfully achieved in all patients. In 699/1023 (68.3%), the vHPSD-only approach (vHPSD group) and in 324/ (31.7%) patients, the hybrid approach (hybrid group) was utilized. The mean procedure duration was 98.4 ± 37.4 min (vHPSD: 88.2 ± 34.9 min, hybrid: 117.4 ± 32.7 min, P < 0.001). The first-pass isolation rate of all PVs was 64% (vHPSD: 62.6%, hybrid: 67.1%, P = 0.187). Severe adverse events were observed in 1.7% (vHPSD: 1.6%, hybrid: 1.9%, P = 0.746). Twelve-month arrhythmia-recurrence-free survival was 77.1% (vHPSD: 76.8%, hybrid: 77.8%, P = 0.241). CONCLUSION: In this large multicentre study, temperature-controlled HPSD and vHPSD ablation via a novel ablation catheter provides safe and effective PVI with a relatively short procedure duration. Despite a shorter procedure time, no differences in terms of safety and freedom from arrhythmia recurrence were found irrespective of utilizing vHPSD or the hybrid approach.
Heeger et al. (Wed,) studied this question.