Why the study?
The study evaluated intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety of the QDot-catheter utilizing temperature-controlled high-power short-duration ablation in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Is temperature controlled high power short duration ablation with 90 watts for 4 seconds using the QDot-catheter safe and efficient for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Is temperature controlled high power short duration ablation with 90 watts for 4 seconds using the QDot-catheter safe and efficient for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
Temperature controlled high power short duration ablation with 90W/4s reduces procedure and RF time without major clinical complications, though steam pops and silent cerebral lesions still occur.
Supports efficient high-power short-duration PVI without clinical complications; leaves open steam-pop and silent-lesion risks pending randomized trials.
Background High power short duration (HPSD) radiofrequency-ablation (RFA) is highly efficient and safe while reducing procedure and RF time in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The QDot-catheter is a novel contact-force ablation catheter that allows automated flow and power adjustments depending on the local tissue temperature to maintain a target temperature during 90watts/4seconds lesions. We analysed intraprocedural data and periprocedural safety using the QDot-catheter in patients undergoing PVI for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Methods We included n=48 patients undergoing PVI with the QDot-catheter with a temperature controlled HPSD ablation mode with 90watts/4seconds (TC-HPSD). If focal reconnection occurred besides repeat ablation the ablation mode was changed to 50watts/15seconds (QMode). N=23 patients underwent cerebral MRI to detect silent cerebral lesions. Results Mean RF-time was 8.1+/-2.8min, procedure-duration was 84.5+/-30min. The overall maximal measured catheter-tip temperature was 52.0°C +/- 4.6°C, mean overall applied current was 871mA +/-44mA and over all applied energy was 316J +/-47J. The mean local impedance-drop was 12.1 +/- 2.4 Ohms. During Adenosine challenge n=14 (29%) patients showed dormant conduction. A total of n=24 steam pops were detected in n=18 patients (39.1%), while no pericardial tamponade occurred. No periprocedural thromboembolic complications occurred, while n=4 patients (17.4%) showed silent cerebral lesion. Conclusion TC-HPSD ablation with 90watts/4seconds using the QDot-catheter led to a reduction of procedure and RF time, while no major complications occurred. Despite optimized temperature control and power adjustment steam pops occurred in a rather high number of patients, while none of them lead to tamponade or to clinical or neurological deficits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kottmaier et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: