PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 10, 2019EP Europace172 citations

Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

View Full Paper
MKMarc KottmaierMPMiruna PopaFBFélix Bourier

Structured PICO

Does high-power short-duration (70 W) radiofrequency ablation improve 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation and reduce procedural times compared to conventional power ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
197 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) scheduled for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)
I
Intervention
High-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation protocol with 70 W and a duration cut-off of 7 s at the anterior left atrium (LA) and 5 s at the posterior LA (n=97)
C
Comparator
Conventional power radiofrequency ablation protocol with 30-40 W for 20-40 s (n=100)
O
Outcome
Periprocedural complications and 1-year outcome (arrhythmia recurrence)hard clinical

High-power short-duration (70 W) ablation for PVI in paroxysmal AF is safe, reduces procedural time, and improves 1-year freedom from AF compared to conventional ablation.

Abstract

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is effective but hampered by pulmonary vein reconnection due to insufficient ablation lesions. High-power delivery over a short period of time (HPSD) in RFA is stated to create more efficient lesions. The aim of this study was to compare intraprocedural safety and outcome of HPSD ablation to conventional power settings in patients undergoing PVI for PAF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 197 patients with PAF that were scheduled for PVI. An ablation protocol with 70 W and a duration cut-off of 7 s at the anterior left atrium (LA) and 5 s at the posterior LA (HPSD group; n = 97) was compared to a conventional power protocol with 30-40 W for 20-40 s (standard group; n = 100) in terms of periprocedural complications and a 1-year outcome. The HPSD group showed significantly less arrhythmia recurrence during 1-year follow-up with 83.1% of patients free from atrial fibrillation compared to 65.1% in the standard group (P < 0.013). No pericardial tamponade, periprocedural thromboembolic complications, or atrio-oesophageal fistula occurred in either group. Mean radiofrequency time (12.4 ± 3.4 min vs. 35.6 ± 12.1 min) and procedural time (89.5 ± 23.9 min vs. 111.15 ± 27.9 min) were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared to the standard group (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: High-power short-duration ablation demonstrated a comparable safety profile to conventional ablation. High-power short-duration ablation using 70 W for 5-7 s leads to significantly less arrhythmia recurrences after 1 year. Radiofrequency and procedural time were significantly shortened.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kottmaier et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff308fb2817e31dfcd6c9https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper