PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 22, 2026Frontiers in Earth Science0 citationsOpen Access

Quantitative identification of dominant controlling factors and productivity prediction for deep–ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs

LJLu JiaGSGuowei ShiJZJinling Zhao

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify the main factors controlling productivity in deep ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs and to improve prediction accuracy.
  • Developed an integrated workflow involving data preprocessing and correlation-based factor screening.
  • Applied machine-learning algorithms, including XGBoost, for single-well and block-level productivity predictions.
  • Utilized Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlation coefficients to determine dominant controlling factors.
  • Identified stable water cut, shut-in time, fracturing-fluid volume, and oil saturation as the core factors affecting productivity.
  • Achieved predictive accuracy exceeding 95% using the XGBoost model.
  • Noted that initial productivity prediction errors were linked to high stable water cut conditions.

Abstract

Deep to ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs are characterized by low porosity, low permeability, and strong heterogeneity, and their productivity is jointly controlled by geological, engineering, and development factors. However, the high-dimensional nonlinearity of these variables and their complex interactions make it difficult for conventional methods to accurately identify dominant controls and achieve reliable productivity prediction. To address this issue, this study developed an integrated workflow combining data preprocessing, multidimensional correlation-based factor screening, single-factor trend analysis based on simple linear regression, and machine-learning-based prediction. Pearson, Spearman, and Kendall correlation coefficients were jointly employed to identify the dominant controlling factors, and multiple predictive algorithms were systematically compared to select the optimal model for productivity prediction at the single-well level and the block-level sample-set level. The results indicate that stable water cut, shut-in time, fracturing-fluid volume, and oil saturation are the core factors controlling productivity. Among the tested models, XGBoost exhibited the best predictive performance, with overall predictive accuracy exceeding 95%. At the block-level sample-set level, errors in initial productivity prediction were mainly associated with excessively high stable water cut, whereas deviations in first-year cumulative production prediction were closely related to high water cut and insufficient shut-in time. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework provides an effective tool for productivity evaluation and prediction within the present dataset and development conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff2a8d674f7c03778b253https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1798221
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Application of Machine Learning for Productivity Prediction in Tight Gas Reservoirs2024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Tight Oil Well Productivity Prediction Model Based on Neural Network2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3Prediction of Hydrodynamic Parameters of the State of the Bottomhole Zone of Wells Using Machine Learning Methods2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4An Improved Decline Curve Analysis Method via Ensemble Learning for Shale Gas Reservoirs2024 · 7 citations
  5. 5Formation, distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon resources in China2013 · 237 citations