Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 22, 2026Annals of Vascular DiseasesOpen Access

TEVAR yields favorable short-term outcomes but requires careful follow-up due to increasing re-intervention risk.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Population

Patients with thoracic aortic diseases, including descending aortic aneurysms, acute and chronic type B…

Comparison

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs Open repair or conservative management

Design

Review

Key result

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides favorable short-term outcomes for thoracic aortic diseases, but careful follow-up is necessary due to the increasing need for re-intervention over time.

Authors

KYKiyomitsu Yasuhara

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports expanding TEVAR use in Japan; leaves open questions on long-term outcomes in broader populations.

Key Points

  • This research examines the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on various thoracic aortic conditions.
  • Assessment of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic aneurysms and dissections.
  • Analysis of clinical outcomes from stent graft implementation over 15 years.
  • Review of follow-up protocols in relation to complications and morphologic changes.
  • Stent grafts have led to increased surgical success rates in aortic disease management.
  • Re-intervention rates rise across all treated conditions over time.
  • Ongoing follow-up is critical due to potential complications post-treatment.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with thoracic aortic diseases, including descending aortic aneurysms, acute and chronic type B dissections, and blunt thoracic aortic injuries
I
Intervention
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)
C
Comparator
Open repair (OR) or conservative management (as discussed in the context of guidelines and previous studies)

This review highlights that while TEVAR is a highly recommended, minimally invasive treatment for thoracic aortic diseases, its long-term efficacy is challenged by the need for re-interventions.

Limitations

  • Re-intervention rates increase over time across all disease groups.
  • Morphologic changes and new complications can occur after treatment.
  • In chronic type B aortic dissection, remodeling in the chronic phase often does not meet expectations.
  • Various adjunctive techniques for chronic aortic dissection remain off-label and lack definitive methodology.

Cite This Study

Kiyomitsu Yasuhara (2026) conducted a review in Thoracic aortic diseases (descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, blunt thoracic aortic injury). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) vs. Open repair or medical management was evaluated. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair provides favorable short-term outcomes for thoracic aortic diseases, but careful follow-up is necessary due to the increasing need for re-intervention over time.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff2a8d674f7c03778b375https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.ra.26-00056
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share