Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study identifies factors impacting in-hospital mortality in elderly patients receiving VV-ECMO, indicating potential for careful selection.
BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is an established therapy for severe respiratory failure; however, few studies have examined the validity of and prognostic factors for VV-ECMO implementation in elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: The present study attempted to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality in elderly patients receiving VV-ECMO. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who received VV-ECMO at a tertiary care center in Japan. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Variables associated with in-hospital mortality were examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 70 years (interquartile range 59-79). Mortality rates increased with age: 14.3% (<49 years), 57.1% (50-59), 41.2% (60-69), 65.4% (70-79), and 93.3% (≥80). Among nine variables that were significant in the univariate analysis, age, an immunocompromised status, and D-dimer levels were selected for the multivariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed that an advanced age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.30 per 10-year increment, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-4.39), an immunocompromised status (adjusted OR 17.66, 95% CI: 3.66-145.37), and D-dimer levels (adjusted OR 1.18 per 5 μg/mL increment, 95% CI: 1.07-1.42) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our predominantly elderly cohort, an advanced age, an immunocompromised status, and elevated D-dimer levels were independently associated with in-hospital mortality among VV-ECMO patients. Despite the high overall mortality, the present results suggest that VV-ECMO may be a reasonable therapeutic option in carefully selected elderly patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: