Retrospective analysis evaluates aesthetic outcomes of fat grafting in breast reconstruction, indicating significant improvement post-mastectomy.
Background: Autologous fat grafting improves breast reconstruction aesthetics, yet impact relative to natural post-reconstructive changes remains poorly characterized.Methods: Retrospective analysis of 92 reconstructions (42 fat-grafted, 50 non-grafted) using BCCT.core and Harvard Scale assessments at 6-12 months.Results: Non-grafted reconstructions demonstrated significant deterioration (46%; BCCT.core p=0.027,Harvard p<0.001) uniformly across modalities.Conventional 3-week radiotherapy produced greater deterioration than 5-day regimens (p=0.036,p=0.024).Fat grafting reversed this trajectory, achieving 88.1% versus 4% complete complaint resolution (Mann-Whitney p<0.001; effect sizes 0.41-0.84)across all reconstruction types and radiotherapy exposures.Irradiated reconstructions demonstrated greatest gains.One to two sessions typically sufficed. Conclusion:Post-reconstructive deterioration should be anticipated.Fat grafting functions as regenerative intervention modifying biological maturation.Findings support proactive staged incorporation into algorithms, particularly for irradiated patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: