Demonstrates improved freezing performance in hybrid giant tiger grouper, suggesting a more sustainable approach.
Freezing is essential for the distribution of hybrid giant tiger grouper ( Epinephelus fuscoguttatus × Epinephelus lanceolatus ), but it often leads to quality deterioration and high energy consumption. In this study, simultaneous pulsed electric field (PEF)-assisted freezing was applied using different pulse widths and electric field strengths to improve freezing performance and product quality. Wide-pulse PEF significantly accelerated freezing, reducing freezing time by up to 55.4%. The shortened crystallization phase observed in freezing curves was accompanied by improved microstructural preservation in histological analysis. These changes resulted in lower drip loss and cooking loss, while maintaining texture properties comparable to fresh samples. According to results from two-way ANOVA analysis, pulse width exhibited a more pronounced effect on freezing performance compared with field strength. Lipid oxidation was not adversely affected, suggesting that corona-related oxidative effects were not evident under the tested conditions, while total volatile basic nitrogen levels were reduced. Furthermore, wide-pulse PEF treatment at 4.5 kV/cm significantly lowered overall energy consumption in a laboratory-scale system. These findings demonstrate the potential of simultaneous PEF-assisted freezing as an effective and sustainable approach for improving frozen seafood quality and energy efficiency. • Simultaneous PEF-assisted freezing shortened freezing time by up to ∼55%. • Pulse width showed a stronger effect than field strength on freezing performance. • Wide-pulse PEF reduced drip loss and cooking loss, indicating improved water-holding capacity. • PEF-assisted freezing preserved muscle microstructure and texture compared with conventional freezing. • Wide-pulse PEF reduced energy consumption and associated GHG emissions in a laboratory-scale system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: