Reconstruction of Elbow Soft-Tissue Defects Using the Reverse Lateral Arm Flap: A Case Series

Background: Complex elbow soft-tissue defects often combine exposed critical structures, unstable scars, and high mechanical stress, making durable coverage and early mobilization challenging. Among regional options, the reverse lateral arm flap provides thin fasciocutaneous tissue based on a reliable collateral circulation and preserves major forearm vessels. The aim of this study was to report our single-center experience with the pedicled reverse lateral arm flap for elbow soft-tissue reconstruction, focusing on stable coverage, donor-site morbidity, and functional recovery. Methods: A retrospective single-center case series was conducted at the Division of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. All consecutive patients treated between 2013 and 2023 with a pedicled reverse lateral arm flap for elbow soft-tissue defects were included. Recorded variables included defect etiology, donor-site management, complications, range of motion, and follow-up. Elbow flexion–extension was recorded clinically preoperatively and at last follow-up. Minimum follow-up was 12 months in all patients. Results: Seven patients underwent reconstruction. Defect etiology was burn-related in four cases, shotgun trauma in one, crush injury in one, and melanoma resection in one. All defects were covered with a pedicled reverse lateral arm flap. All flaps survived completely without partial necrosis or flap-related reoperation. Donor-site closure was primary in four patients and required split-thickness skin grafting in three. One patient developed donor-site keloid, and one had donor-site skin-graft partial loss with delayed healing. Elbow flexion–extension improved in all seven cases, with a median gain in arc of motion of 25° (range 15–41°). Conclusions: In this series, the reverse lateral arm flap provided complete coverage of selected elbow defects with preserved motion and limited donor-site morbidity at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Our findings suggest that it may represent a useful regional option in selected posterior and lateral elbow defects, particularly in post-burn and traumatic settings where thin vascularized tissue is needed, and free-flap reconstruction may be avoidable.