Prospective observational study assesses glycemic control during Ramadan fasting in adults with type 1 diabetes, indicating the need for pre-Ramadan evaluation.
Ramadan fasting poses clinical challenges for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), particularly with respect to glycemic control. Real-world data describing changes in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)–derived metrics across Ramadan remain limited. This study assessed changes in CGM-derived glycemic parameters during Ramadan fasting in adults with T1DM and explored whether these changes differed according to baseline glycemic control. This prospective observational real-world study included 81 adults with T1DM who intended to fast during Ramadan 2025 and were routinely followed at two diabetes centers. CGM-derived parameters, including average glucose concentration, time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), time below range (TBR), and glycemic variability, were evaluated across three predefined periods: pre-Ramadan, the first two weeks of Ramadan, and the last two weeks of Ramadan. Changes over time were assessed using non-parametric paired comparisons. Subgroup analyses were performed according to baseline HbA1c level (≤ 7% vs. >7%) among participants with available data, and findings were interpreted descriptively. The median age of participants was 30 years, and 35.8% were men. Median HbA1c was 8.0% (IQR: 7–9%). TIR declined from the pre-Ramadan period (51.5%) to the first two weeks of Ramadan (45.0%) and remained lower during the last two weeks (47.0%). Average glucose concentrations increased during Ramadan, while TBR and glycemic variability showed no consistent changes. Participants with HbA1c > 7% experienced more pronounced deterioration in glycemic parameters, whereas those with HbA1c ≤ 7% demonstrated smaller and largely transient changes. In this real-world cohort of adults with T1DM, Ramadan fasting was associated with deterioration in CGM-derived glycemic control, particularly among individuals with suboptimal pre-Ramadan glycemic control. These findings highlight the importance of pre-Ramadan assessment, patient education, and CGM use to support safer fasting in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Surrati et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: