Phenomenological exploration reveals insights into meditative experiences in Buddhist texts, indicating deeper understanding.
In this article, I expand on the approach suggested by Huifeng and explored in my earlier publications. Here, I approach Prajñāpāramitā as primarily concerned with experience rather than reality or metaphysics. More precisely, I argue that Prajñāpāramitā is concerned with the absence of experience in deep meditative states. I explore the idea of “phenomenological” reading and note how it differs from the hegemonic metaphysical readings in a general way. The resulting heuristic is then applied to reading passages from the opening of the Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā, some of which are apparently paradoxical. At the very least, I show that we are not forced to read these parts of the text as addressing metaphysical issues. I also try to show that the phenomenological reading is superior, since it can be directly connected to standard Buddhist soteriological concerns, avoids paradoxes, and leaves logic intact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayarava Attwood (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: