Evaluates nematicides' effectiveness in reducing nematode impact on soybean cultivars, suggesting resistance is key.
Seven commercially available seed-applied nematicides were evaluated in a greenhouse pot experiment and in two field experiments using Meloidogyne incognita-susceptible and partially resistant maturity group IV soybean cultivars. Nematicide treatments were abamectin, fluopyram, pydiflumetofen, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (PTA4838), B. amyloliquefaciens + cis-jasmone, B. flavus (I-1582), and Burkholderia rinojensis (A396). Soybean plants were inoculated with approximately 3,000 M. incognita eggs/pot in the greenhouse experiment. Field experiments were conducted in sites with naturally high infestation levels, averaging 450 nematodes/100 cm3 soil after harvest. In the greenhouse, lower root galling and nematode reproduction were observed with seed-applied fluopyram compared to other nematicides and the non-treated control on a susceptible soybean cultivar. Whereas none of the seed-applied nematicides consistently suppressed root galling or protected grain yield in either the susceptible or partially resistant soybean cultivars in the field experiments. Nematicides provided an average of 0.3% yield protection for susceptible cultivars and had no measurable effect on partially resistant cultivars. In contrast, partially resistant cultivars produced, on average, 50% greater grain yield than the susceptible cultivar. These results demonstrate that seed-applied nematicides provide minimal yield protection under high M. incognita population densities, whereas host plant resistance remains the most effective and reliable management strategy in soybean production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baker et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: