Retrospective analysis evaluates LDH and IL-6's early predictive value for severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children, suggesting a dual-pathology model.
Background: The incidence of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (SMPP) in children has markedly increased in the post-COVID-19 era. Current diagnosis approaches often rely on persistent fever, which may delay early identification. This study aims to evaluate the synergistic value of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) for early stratification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 210 hospitalized children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP; 120 severe and 90 non-severe). Independent risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression to build a dynamic nomogram. To validate the model's early warning capability and exclude circularity, a specific subgroup analysis was performed on patients admitted in the early phase of illness (fever duration <7 days). Results: LDH, IL-6, and pre-admission fever duration were independent predictors. The combined nomogram outperformed single biomarkers with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.827. Crucially, in the early-phase subgroup, both IL-6 and LDH remained significantly elevated in SMPP cases (p < 0.05), proving that pathological signals precede the clinical threshold for severity. The study revealed a “two-axis” mechanism whereby IL-6 quantified systemic inflammation, while LDH reflected local tissue hypoxia (e.g., atelectasis), distinct from the systemic response. Decision Curve Analysis further confirmed the model's clinical utility. Conclusion: This study proposes a dual-pathology stratification model where IL-6 reflects cytokine storm and LDH indicates tissue injury. The nomogram reliably identifies high-risk children in the early illness phase, facilitating intervention before persistent fever develops.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: