Parametric optimization enhances energy harvesting performance in low-speed wind environments, suggesting new design avenues.
Under low wind speed conditions, conventional bluff body energy harvesters suffer from a single vibration mechanism and a narrow effective wind speed range, making it difficult to meet the continuous power supply demands of miniature electronic devices. In this paper, by systematically optimizing the number of triangular prisms N and the circumferential installation angle α, a parametrically adjustable star-shaped energy harvester (SEH) is proposed. The proposed structure consists of a cylindrical base with a tunable number of triangular prisms uniformly distributed along its circumference, aiming to reveal the regulation mechanism of the VIV-galloping coupling response and energy harvesting performance. Conceptual design and theoretical modeling of the SEH are first carried out. Then, three-dimensional fluid–structure interaction simulations are performed by varying N and α, and a prototype is fabricated for wind tunnel experimental validation. The results show that under the optimal parameter combination of N = 7 and α = 51.4°, the SEH achieves a maximum output voltage of 12.2 V at a wind speed of 3.41 m/s, with a maximum output power of 1.488 mW, and the effective wind speed range is broadened to 2.5~12.44 m/s. Compared with the conventional cylindrical energy harvester (CEH), the SEH (N = 7) increases the maximum output voltage by 44.38%, the maximum output power by 108.4%, and expands the effective wind speed range by 198.50%. Through systematic optimization of key geometric parameters, this study achieves synergistic regulation of flow-induced vibration modes and performance enhancement, providing a parametric design basis for efficient low-speed wind energy harvesting, which can promote the development of self-powered technologies for micro-sensors and IoT devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: