Randomized trial examines the link between bristle splaying and contact pressure in powered toothbrush users with gingival recession, indicating potential implications for oral care efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: Bristle splaying may be associated with reduced cleaning efficacy; however, the relationship between the bristle splaying index (BSI) and contact pressure (CP) during brushing with a powered toothbrush (PT) with real-time CP control for oscillating brush head movement (range: 0.8-2.5 N) remains unknown. METHODS: This subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial (RCT), which included 47 subjects with gingival recession (GR), included digitally recorded data from 42 PT users: total brushing time (Btime; in minutes), brush head usage time (BHtime; in days), mean CP (in N), time duration with CP > 2.5 N (CPhigh; in minutes) and CP < 0.8 N (CPlow; in minutes) over 1 year with quarterly brush head replacement (Q1-Q4). The extent of bristle splaying was measured using a standardised set-up to calculate the BSI. In addition to multivariate statistical tests, a linear regression model was employed (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The highest BSI (mean (standard deviation)) occurred in Q1 with 7.9 (4.8) (p ≤ 0.001) (BSI in Q2/Q3/Q4: 5.5 (4.9)/4.4 (4.0)/3.5 (2.8); p > 0.05), with Btime, BHtime, CP, CPlow and CPhigh remaining constant (p > 0.05). The BSI was significantly correlated with the CP (r = 0.252; p = 0.001) and study quarter (r = -0.363; p < 0.001), but not with subject gender (r = 0.088; p = 0.254) and age (r = -0.025; p = 0.745), nor with Btime (r = 0.009; p = 0.905), BHtime (r = 0.109; p = 0.158), CPlow (r = -0.104; p = 0.181) and CPhigh (r = 0.145; p = 0.061). The regression model showed a significant effect on the BSI for the CP (B = 2.912; p < 0.001) and study quarter (B = 1.678; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cleaning periods with a CP > 2.5 N were short and did not result in higher BSI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CP with PT may be important for cleaning efficacy, safety of the marginal gingiva and reduced brushing head wear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graetz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: