Evaluates thermal and exergy efficiency in direct steam generation solar receivers, suggesting design improvements for better energy utilization.
Direct steam generation (DSG) in linear parabolic collectors represents an effective pathway to improve solar-thermal energy utilization by eliminating the constraints of conventional heat-transfer fluids and enabling higher operating temperatures. This study develops a comprehensive energy and exergy modeling framework for a DSG solar collector receiver, integrating optical–thermal characteristics with detailed representations of radiative, convective, and conductive heat-loss mechanisms. The receiver performance is investigated under varying solar irradiance levels and mass flow rates, and the axial thermal behavior is resolved into three distinct regions corresponding to single-phase heating up to saturation, two-phase evaporation, and superheated steam heating. The numerical approach is validated through a grid-independence study, demonstrating solution stability beyond 1000 elements, and through consistency checks with published correlations for temperature evolution and two-phase pressure-drop behavior. The results indicate that, at a solar irradiance of 1000 W m − 2 and an optical quality of 0.8, the receiver achieves a thermal efficiency of 92.17%. Exergy analysis reveals an overall receiver exergy efficiency in the range of 35–38% at 900 W m − 2 , assuming a reference temperature of 298 K, underscoring the impact of irreversibilities associated with finite-temperature heat transfer and environmental losses. The distribution of exergy destruction shows that radiative and ambient losses account for 44.9%, followed by conduction (31.8%) and convection (23.3%). These findings provide practical guidance for receiver design improvements and operational strategies aimed at more effective solar energy exploitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Akayshee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: