Compares antibacterial efficacy of polyphenol–chitosan hydrogels for wound healing, suggesting promising treatment options.
This study aimed to develop antibacterial polyphenol–chitosan hydrogel dressings and, more importantly, to compare how three structurally distinct low-cost natural polyphenols—protocatechuic acid (PCA), gallic acid (GA), and tannic acid (TA)—regulate hydrogel performance within the same chitosan platform. PCA, GA, and TA were incorporated into chitosan to obtain the corresponding hydrogels, denoted CS-PCA, CS-GA, and CS-TA. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed that all formulations possessed a three-dimensional porous network. Rheological characterization revealed favorable viscoelastic behavior for all polyphenol-containing hydrogels, with CS-TA showing the highest mechanical strength in the present system. The hydrogels also exhibited pH-responsive swelling, good tissue adhesion, self-healing ability, and injectability. In vitro antibacterial assays demonstrated activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms, with CS-TA showing the most favorable overall antibacterial performance under the tested conditions. In a rat full-thickness wound model, hydrogel treatment accelerated wound closure, while H&E staining indicated enhanced granulation tissue formation, collagen deposition, and reduced inflammatory cell infiltration. Collectively, these findings support the use of polyphenol–chitosan composite hydrogels as promising wound-dressing candidates and highlight the value of a side-by-side comparison of PCA, GA, and TA for understanding structure–property–function relationships in this class of materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: