Randomized trial examines optimal cement choice for concrete performance using various sands in Cameroon, indicating preferred pairings for improvement.
Sand properties and cement selection play a critical role in determining the performance and durability of concrete, particularly when aggregate mineralogy and chemistry are insufficiently characterised. This study investigates the mineralogical and physico-chemical properties of sands sourced from five sandpits (Wum, Mbengwi, Ndop, Chomba, and Mbatu) in the Northwest region of Cameroon and evaluates their compatibility with three commercial 42.5R-class cements (CIMAF, Dangote 3X, and MIRA-CO). Mineralogical characterisation was performed using X-ray diffraction, and mortar mixtures were prepared at a fixed sand-to-cement ratio (2.5) to assess water demand and mechanical performance. Mortar cubes with a size of 70 mm were prepared to evaluate the mechanical properties. Results show that Ndop sand exhibited the highest water absorption, at 15.17%, while Mbengwi recorded the lowest water absorption, at 8.07%. Chomba was found to be the densest sand, with a specific gravity (SG) of 2.537 g/cm3, whereas Ndop sand had the the lowest SG (2.427 g/cm3). The fineness moduli were within the normal range. Mbatu sand required the highest water-to-cement ratio (80%) when used with CIMAF and MIRA-CO cements, whereas Chomba required the lowest value (65%) when used with Dangote cement. In terms of mechanical properties, the highest 7-day and 28-day compressive strengths were recorded for CIMAF and Dangote cements, respectively, whereas MIRA-CO cement yielded the lowest strength values. The Dangote-Mbengwi pair achieved the highest 28-day compressive strength of 27.54 MPa, whereas the Mbengwi-MIRA-CO pair exhibited the lowest of 12.36 MPa. A similar trend was observed in tensile strength. The Dangote-Mbengwi pair was the best combination. Blended cements with pozzolanic additives exhibited superior long-term strength when combined with sands of low chemical reactivity and a high CaO/SiO₂ ratio, whereas fly ash-based blends performed better with more acidic sands. It is recommended that each sand be used with the cement with which it performs best in order to achieve improved properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: