Key result
Perioperative hydroxyethyl starch does not increase acute kidney injury risk in surgical patients.
Why the study?
Regulatory warnings and withdrawals restricted hydroxyethyl starch use due to renal injury concerns in critically ill and septic patients, prompting an updated meta-analysis focusing on renal outcomes in surgical patients.
Does hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42) increase the risk of acute kidney injury or worsen creatinine concentration in surgical patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,951)
Does hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42) increase the risk of acute kidney injury or worsen creatinine concentration in surgical patients?
Effect estimate: RR 1.02 (95% CI 0.91-1.16)
Current hydroxyethyl starch solutions (HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42) do not provoke renal injury or increase acute kidney injury risk in surgical patients.
Background: Based on renal injury reported in critically ill and septic patients, the Food and Drug Administration issued a black box warning regarding hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) use in 2013, and expanded the warning to surgical and trauma patients in 2021. Similarly, the European Medicines Agency initiated withdrawal of hydroxyethyl starch in 2022. We therefore conducted a new meta-analysis focused on renal injury designed to complement a 2021 meta-analysis of perioperative hydroxyethyl starch use, adding 45 trials and 6895 patients. Our focus was acute kidney injury and preoperative-to-postoperative change in creatinine concentration in surgical patients. Methods: We searched 4 publication databases in 6 languages using predefined criteria. Standard meta-analytic techniques were used to evaluate trial quality and publication bias. Trial selection and evaluation were conducted by independent investigators with adjudication as necessary. Selected trials all used HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42, without restriction on type of surgery or solution type. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan5) using random-effect models and results are reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: After screening 1,114 studies, we included 114 trials (2009-2026) with 13,951 patients. Most were at low risk of bias and there was no evidence of publication bias. Patients had major cardiac (30%), major abdominal (46%) and other surgical procedures (24%). Nearly all trials restricted HES administration to <24 hours. HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42 did not significantly increase the risk of acute kidney injury (relative risk 1.02 [0.91, 1.16]) or worsen preoperative-to-postoperative creatinine concentration (-0.62 [-3.82, 2.57] µmol/L). Trial sequential analysis indicated strong non-inferiority for the change in creatinine concentration and adequate information size. HES did not meaningfully worsen any other outcome we evaluated including overall or severe adverse events or mortality. Conclusion: Current hydroxyethyl starch solutions do not provoke renal injury in surgical patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sessler et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in surgical patients (n=13,951). Hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4 or HES 130/0.42) was evaluated on acute kidney injury (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91-1.16). Perioperative use of hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4 or 130/0.42) did not significantly increase the risk of acute kidney injury in surgical patients (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.91-1.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: