Case-control study examines clinical characteristics and outcomes in anti-Th/To positive systemic sclerosis patients, indicating potential for personalized care.
Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease, where autoantibody profiling plays a central role in defining disease subsets and guiding personalized management. Objectives: To investigate the clinical phenotype and long-term outcomes of anti-Th/To positive SSc patients in an international cohort, focusing on interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), malignancy association, organ damage accrual, and mortality within a precision medicine framework. Design: Multicenter case-control study. Methods: Data prospectively collected from 28 European Scleroderma Trial and Research centers were analyzed (CP144). For each anti-Th/To+ case, two anti-Th/To- controls were matched by sex, age at onset, and disease duration to enable detailed phenotypic comparisons. Results: A total of 102 anti-Th/To+ patients were compared to 204 anti-Th/To- matched controls. Anti-Th/To+ patients had a higher prevalence of concomitant anti-Ro52+, lower frequency of diffuse cutaneous involvement, digital ulcers, pitting scars, and telangiectasias. ILD on high-resolution computed tomography and ILD functional progression events were less frequent in anti-Th/To+ patients, and anti-Th/To positivity was not independently associated with ILD in multivariable analysis. Instead, ILD presence was significantly associated with anti-Topoisomerase-1 (anti-Topo1) and anti-Ro52 positivity, and lack of anticentromere antibodies. Similarly, myocarditis was less frequently observed in anti-Th/To+ cases, although myositis had a higher rate than in anti-centromere+ or other lcSSc patients. Other SSc manifestations, including PAH, and malignancies synchronous to SSc onset had similar frequencies between cases and controls. Anti-Th/To+ patients accrued mild organ damage during the disease course, with lower damage index scores than anti-Topo1+ matched controls. No SSc-related deaths occurred in anti-Th/To+ patients, who had survival curves slightly better, although not significantly different, than matched controls. Conclusion: Anti-Th/To+ SSc patients are characterized by low prevalence of major organ involvement, including ILD, when compared to matched controls, mild organ damage, and good survival. These results reinforce the ongoing use of autoantibody profiling-including rarer antibodies-in precision medicine for SSc. Understanding the features of systemic sclerosis patients with anti-Th/To antibodies: a study comparing patients within the European EUSTAR network Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease that affects the skin and internal organs. Doctors use specific antibodies detected in the blood to help predict how the disease might progress. However, some rare antibodies, like anti-Th/To, are not well understood. This study was done to better understand what anti-Th/To antibodies mean for patients with SSc, especially regarding lung and heart complications, cancer risk, and overall health outcomes. The researchers collected and analyzed medical data from a large group of patients with systemic sclerosis across multiple centers in Europe. They compared patients who had anti-Th/To antibodies with similar patients who did not have these antibodies, looking closely at differences in lung disease, heart complications, cancer occurrence, organ damage, and survival over time. They found that patients with anti-Th/To antibodies had less severe lung disease and fewer major organ complications compared to those without these antibodies. These patients also showed milder organ damage over time and had better overall survival rates. Some differences in other disease features were noted, but the presence of these antibodies was linked to a generally more favorable disease course. The findings show that patients with anti-Th/To antibodies tend to have less severe organ involvement, especially less lung disease, and generally better health outcomes compared to similar patients without these antibodies. This information helps doctors better understand and predict disease progression in systemic sclerosis, supporting more personalized care based on patients’ specific antibody profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moschetti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: