Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis reveals poor prognosis in Wilms tumor patients with bone metastases, indicating need for targeted treatment.
Background Wilms tumor (WT) has an excellent outcome. Studies suggest that patients with WT and bone metastases (WT-BM) have a poor prognosis. This analysis describes the characteristics and outcome of patients with WT-BM, registered by the International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) and UK-IMPORT STUDY.Methods We retrospectively assessed clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with WT-BM at diagnosis treated according to SIOP-RTSG 93-01, SIOP 2001/UK-IMPORT study protocols.Results Among 7399 patients diagnosed with WT between 1993 and 2019, 47 were identified with WT-BM (12 males/35 females), accounting for 3.3% of stage IV-WT. The median age at diagnosis was 63 months (24-292 months). Four patients (9%) had only BM involvement and 43 patients (91%) had multisite metastases. Local stage was I-II in 15 (32%) patients, stage III in 26 (55%) patients, and unknown in 6 (13%) patients. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of three drugs in 95% of cases with available data (38/40). Histological subtyping identified low-risk (LR, n = 4), intermediate-risk (IR, n = 29), high-risk (HR, n = 7) tumors, unknown/others in seven patients. The majority had postoperative treatment according to protocol. Among 35 patients with data, 33 (94%) received any kind of radiotherapy. EFS and OS were 67% and 74% at 2 years, decreasing to 64% and 62% at five years. EFS at 2 years was 14% in the HR group and 84% in the IR group.Conclusions WT-BM is a rare condition. Awareness of its existence and multimodality treatment are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagarelli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: