From Imaging to Implementation: Computed-Tomography-Based Surgical Artificial Intelligence Using DIEP Flap Reconstruction as a Model System

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly proposed to improve surgical planning, guidance, and postoperative surveillance. Yet many promising applications remain disconnected from the full surgical pathway and the feasible limitations of clinical deployment. In contrast to prior reviews that primarily catalog AI use cases, this review combines the literature to define the translational pathway—from label design through staged validation to workflow integration—required for clinically deployable computed tomography (CT)-based surgical AI. CT and particularly computed tomography angiography (CTA) are especially usable sources for surgical AI because they provide a standardized three-dimensional anatomic model that is already embedded in many clinical workflows. In autologous breast reconstruction, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap CTA offers an unusually strong model system: the anatomy is discrete, surgeon decisions are actionable, and downstream operative and postoperative outcomes are measurable. These characteristics make DIEP reconstruction suitable not only for technical model development, but also for exacting testing of how CT-based AI should be annotated, validated, displayed, and governed. Methods: This focused narrative review combines evidence across the surgical workflow, spanning preoperative planning and risk stratification, intraoperative support, and postoperative monitoring. Reporting standards, implementation frameworks, governance, and regulatory sources were also considered when directly relevant to clinical deployment. Results: Across the available literature on breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap, preoperative CTA has been associated with reductions in operative time of approximately 54–76 min in individual studies. Semi-automated perforator mapping can reduce review time from 2 to 3 h to approximately 30 min. Intraoperative extended-reality tools and surgeon-facing navigation systems illustrate the importance of the ‘last mile’ of translation, while postoperative monitoring models show how imaging-linked data can support a closed-loop learning system. Across these stages, recurring limits include target mismatch, weak external validation, protocol variability, inconsistent reporting, limited subgroup analysis, and inadequate integration of economic and governance considerations. Conclusions: We argue that the next important step is not a generic autonomous model, but a clinically deployable DIEP-CTA-AI program. The practical blueprint proposed here is staged: structured anatomical labels, separate imaging, surgeons’ decisions, and outcome reference standards, dense intermediate endpoints, retrospective and external validation, reader studies, prospective silent deployment, and workflow-impact assessment. If implemented in this way, DIEP flap CTA can serve as a practical blueprint for CT-based AI translation in surgery more broadly.