Evaluates flash flood susceptibility in Zhaotong, China, highlighting urban expansion effects.
Under the dual pressures of global climate change and rapid urbanization, the spatial contradiction between urban expansion and flash flood disasters in mountainous dam areas is increasingly evident. However, the mechanisms by which the multi-dimensional characteristics of urban expansion affect regional flash flood susceptibility (FFS) remain unclear, limiting scientific guidance for source-level disaster prevention. This study uses Zhaotong City, a flash flood-prone area in the lower Jinsha River basin of southwestern China, as a case study. Using land use and multi-source remote sensing data from 2000 and 2025, we identify urban expansion patterns and morphological characteristics, apply the XGBoost-SHAP model to evaluate flash flood susceptibility and determine dominant factors, and employ the generalized additive model (GAM) to quantify the nonlinear responses of expansion dimensions to FFS. Results show the following: (1) Urban expansion in Zhaotong City is primarily edge (51%) and leapfrog (46%), clustering along river valleys, dam areas, and transportation corridors. (2) The XGBoost model performs well (AUC = 0.877). Elevation, slope, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and precipitation are the primary natural factors influencing FFS. About 15.66% of the city falls within the high/very high FFS zones, mainly in the Zhaolu Dam area, riverbanks of main and tributary streams, and the urban built-up area. (3) Urban expansion-related indicators explain 28.6% of the spatial variation in FFS, with leapfrog expansion as the primary driver (contribution rate 32.75%). Disorderly urban growth and morphological imbalance significantly increase flash flood susceptibility. This study provides a scientific basis for spatial planning, flash flood prevention and control, and climate-adaptive urban development in similar mountainous dam areas in Southwest China and Asia, supporting regional sustainable development goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: