Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bibliometric analysis identifies trends in ridge-furrow systems, highlighting gaps and future research directions.
This study presents a bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on the ridge–furrow system from 1964 to 2024, based on approximately 300 documents retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The data were analyzed using bibliometric tools. Scientific output exhibited a steady increase over recent decades, with a more pronounced expansion after 2010, in line with the growing interest in conservation agriculture practices and the efficient management of water and soil resources. Several collaboration clusters were identified, with certain authors standing out due to their high influence and centrality within the scientific network on the ridge–furrow system. The identified studies primarily focus on soil physical properties, water conservation, agricultural productivity, and erosion mitigation, indicating that the ridge–furrow system has been extensively investigated as a strategy to improve edaphic conditions and crop performance. Despite these advances, relevant knowledge gaps remain in the understanding of soil and water conservation processes within ridge–furrow systems. Integrated approaches linking water balance, soil attributes, and crop productivity are still lacking, as are long‐term studies that clarify the cumulative effects of management practices. In addition, studies under diverse environmental conditions and stronger connections between experimental research and practical applications remain limited. These limitations highlight the need for more comprehensive investigations to enhance understanding and guide improvements in ridge–furrow systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Güths et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: